Posted on May 27, 2015 by charlesbradley
I see a lot of Scrum Masters who focus on the wrong things. I was having some conversations with some Scrum trainers recently, and the conversation inspired an idea in me: The Scrum Master Canvas.
The Scrum Master Canvas
The Scrum Master Canvas, similar to the Business Model Canvas that we teach in our Product Owner courses, focuses on the things that a Scrum Master should be thinking about, in order to help her team get better at delivering more value, sooner.
So, I’ve started with some initial section ideas that might be useful to have on such a canvas:
- “Long term Impediments”
- “Short term Impediments”
- Service to the Organization
- “What are my next steps in coaching the organization to get more benefits from Scrum?”
- “Which audiences require the different Coaching Stances?” (A table with “audience” and “coaching stance” column headers)
- “What is on the radar of the wider Scrum Master Community of Practice?”
- “Organizations (and sometimes me!) tend to incorrectly assign duties to the Scrum Master. What are my next steps in re-focusing those duties to where they really should be directed in Scrum?”
- Service to the Development Team
- “What are my next steps in helping the Dev Team become more Self Organizing so I can ‘Let the Team Decide’?”
- “What is on my Dev Team’s Improvement Backlog right now?”
- “What are my Dev Team’s next steps for achieving a higher degree of technical excellence?” (A table with “Next Steps” and “How can I support that?” as column headers)
- “What things should I NOT do, so that the Scrum Team can become more Self Organizing?”
- “What are my next steps in teaching/coaching the Dev Team to understand and enact Scrum?”
- Service to the Product Owner
- Service to myself, the Scrum Master
- “In order to help my organization grow its’ Agility, what are my next steps for me learning and self improvement?”
- “Am I working at a sustainable pace? Do I need to coach others on what that means?”
- “What things should I NOT do, so that the Scrum Team can become more Self Organizing” (repeated for emphasis!)
- “What else do I need to focus on, that’s not covered in a different section?”
The Scrum Master would initially create this canvas, put it on a rather large piece of paper (Information Radiator!), and likely hang it in their office in a place that is highly visible to those who walk by. In this way, in addition to focusing the Scrum Master on their role, it would also educate others in the organization on what a Scrum Master should focus on. Often times the wider organization also encourages the Scrum Master to focus on the wrong things. Maybe having this canvas would help them change their expectations of the Scrum Master, too. Anyway, you get the idea.
The Scrum Master would also probably want to schedule a calendar reminder, say every Sprint or so, to review their Canvas, edit it, and make sure they are staying on track. Then, maybe another set of calendar reminders every month or every quarter, to create a fresh copy of the canvas.
For a high quality class that focuses exclusively on the Scrum Master role, see our Professional Scrum Master class and contact us if you’re interested in one.
So, what would be on your Scrum Master Canvas?
Filed under: Organizational Change, Scrum, Scrum Adoption, ScrumMaster Tips | 2 Comments »
Posted on January 29, 2015 by charlesbradley
There’s a new generation of entrepreneurs that cares more than just about short term money grabs, an all too often desire from wall street investors. The value of a company is in the intermediate to long term, in creativity, experimenting, empowering, and innovating — and companies like Facebook, Apple, Google, Amazon are eating the rest of the industry’s lunch. Get ready, because Apple will be your new bank, and Google will be your new cell phone and internet provider. The legacy companies are dying off like the dinosaurs. IBM and Blackberry are on my radar as some of the next to go down in flames. Microsoft, while struggling, is adapting, so I think they will make a comeback if they continue to change course.
We are lucky enough to be in the business of helping companies compete in this very daunting marketplace. Give us a call if we can help you out.
“Software is Eating the World”
Facebook’s Zuckerberg Defends Internet.org investement
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »
Posted on January 12, 2015 by charlesbradley
Happy New Year!!
I’ll post more updates on this exciting development as the new assessments and credentials go into service!
We will be providing PSM II courses later this year for those who want to take their Scrum skills — literally — to the next level.
Filed under: Agile, Scrum, Scrum Adoption, ScrumMaster Tips | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 22, 2014 by charlesbradley
My new recommended “starter” “complementary practice” for new Scrum teams is to simply create tasks and use the “number of tasks remaining” for a burndown. (I also usually recommend that they try to make it such that the vast majority of their tasks are roughly 1 day or less) I encourage them more to focus on PRI (potentially releasable increments), Sprint Goals, and achieving a moderately consistent level of skill at meeting their Sprint forecasts (used to be called “Sprint commitment,” it’s been re-named in the Scrum Guide). I also caution heavily against trying to achieve perfect forecast accuracy as that’s a fool’s errand in complex domains.
Using hours for tasks can lead down some really bad roads, most notably: Former PM’s turned SM’s and other organizational members who try to apply PMI tactics (100% utilization, tracking actuals, etc) tactics to complex software development. By preferring “sticking to the plan” over “responding to change”, they are completely violating Agile and Scrum.
This same bad road can also lead companies into think that “schedule/scope/cost” is an optimum model for software development. As far as I’m concerned, schedule/scope/cost is a dead, failed model for software.
Now, using hours for tasks doesn’t have to lead down those bad roads — but in my experiences, they usually do. Let’s not forget, Scrum used to require hours for task estimation, many years ago, but the Scrum experiences of the wider community over 20 years has spoken on the topic — hours is not always optimum. I would go farther than that and say, at the Sprint task level, it’s usually NOT optimum.
Given the above, I’ll leave it as an exercise to others to describe where using task hours might not lead down those bad roads.
Professional Scrum Trainer
- Scrum For Executives
- Agile Requirements: Product Owner and Team Collaboration Techniques
- Scrum Product Owner: Techniques for Success
- Evidence Based Management for Software Organizations(TM)
- Class for Software Development Managers and Executives
If you’re interested in any of our classes, training, or coaching services, feel free to contact us.
Filed under: Agile, Scrum, Scrum Adoption, Scrum Strategies, ScrumMaster Tips, Sprint Backlog, Sprint Planning | 2 Comments »
Posted on July 25, 2014 by charlesbradley
I was lucky enough to get a preview of the “Scrum At Scale” approach from Scrum Inc a few days ago. In short, it’s a model for conversations around how to think about scaling Scrum in the enterprise. The model is modular, and it is very clear that this approach is more lightweight and flexible than other Agile scaling approaches that get a lot of attention. Alex Brown of Scrum Inc, the Product Owner for the model, as well as Jeff Sutherland, are very adamant that this this not some cookie cutter recipe or methodology to scale Scrum. It’s different than other approaches, in that it’s a model for conversations around inspecting and adapting toward success with Scrum at Scale.
I’m told that the slides for the presentation at the link above will be posted there within the next couple of days, and possibly sooner. The slides will add a lot of detail that the main graphic doesn’t give. I will also add that there is some nuance and detail not included in the slides either. As such, I recommend try to attend one of their live or recorded video presentations to get some richer nuance…. or….
They are also presenting on this topic at Agile 2014 next week. If you’re going to be at Agile 2014, I highly recommend you put their session on your “must see” list.
The model gives a “big picture” view of Scrum in the enterprise, but it also dovetails nicely with the many years of work that Jeff Sutherland and others have put into their Scrum Patterns efforts. As you may know, I’m also a fan of this Scrum patterns concept, and you can see an example of that work on my website — Daily Scrum Patterns.
It’s worth mentioning that I have no business relationship whatsoever with Scrum Inc, so I’m not in any way incentivized to advocate for their approach. I’m only endorsing it because I believe in the approach and in it’s future.
I suspect that this work will be a game changer in the Scrum scaling space, which doesn’t surprise me, really. It *is,* after all, coming from a company run by the co-creator of Scrum! Nice work Alex Brown, Jeff Sutherland, and Scrum Inc!
Filed under: Agile, Organizational Change, Scrum, Scrum Adoption, Scrum Patterns | 3 Comments »
Posted on April 10, 2014 by charlesbradley
For much better alternatives to SAFe(tm), see this page.
All my personal/professional opinion.
I’m not a big fan of SAFe(tm). I haven’t yet had time to sit down and detail all of the problems I have with it, but I’ll hit a couple.
1. It’s not Agile at all. It’s a sales strategy.
My biggest problem with it is that it condones old, out of date, and dysfunctional practices that don’t enhance Agility. It is essentially a hybrid approach of Waterfall and Agile, along with a lot of baggage from RUP. This probably shouldn’t surprise anyone since the creator, Dean Leffingwell, was a big salesman/evangelist for RUP. The biggest baggage from RUP is the complexity of a zillion different roles and the fact that SAFe is a “slice and dice” methodology. It’s not a framework. I think the “slice and dice” thing is really just a slick sales strategy. It allows those selling SAFe to immediately disown any practice of SAFe that a potential client complains isn’t Agile or won’t work. It also means that any tiny subset of SAFe is still considered to be SAFe. As such, I just consider this a sales strategy to sell more billable hours. This strategy was also used in RUP, and yet… over the years… which has prospered more? RUP or Scrum? Scrum is a framework, so there is no slice and dicing of the framework itself.
2. It misleads people into thinking that it uses Scrum at the team level.
It claims to use Scrum at the team level, but then completely sells out Scrum in so many ways. It sells out the Product Owner role by giving control to all manner of people over the Product Backlog contents, something Scrum expressly forbids. It sells out the Scrum Master role by suggesting it’s a 25% time commitment. Then, it completely sells out the Development Team by creating Ivory Tower architects.
3. To date, no Agile Manifesto author has endorsed it. That should tell you something right there.
This one is self explanatory. :-)
The reasons I don’t like it are covered in way more detail in these reviews of SAFe by other people who are sharp enough to tell the differences between SAFe and other approaches, as well as the history behind similar practices and approaches
For much better alternatives to SAFe(tm), see this page.
Filed under: Agile, Organizational Change, Scrum | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 4, 2014 by charlesbradley
Hello ScrumCrazy readers,
I’m proud to announce that my article on the “Scrum of Scrums” practice got posted on Scrum.org.
In the article I give some advice on excellence in execution of the Scrum of Scrums practice, and how the Scrum of Scrums has been misinterpreted my many to be a status meeting. It’s an event of the Development Teams, by the Development Teams, and for the Development Teams!
Please give it a look and give me feedback here or there. Feedback welcome!
Filed under: Scrum, Scrum Patterns, Scrum Strategies, ScrumMaster Tips, The Daily Scrum | Leave a comment »